Same-day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation under a nurse-coordinated standardized protocol.

AIMS: Same-day discharge (SDD) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is an effective means to spare healthcare resources. However, safety remains a concern, and besides structural adaptations, SDD requires more efficient logistics and coordination. Therefore, in this study, we implement a streamlined, nurse-coordinated SDD programme following a standardized protocol. METHODS AND RESULTS: As a dedicated SDD coordinator, a nurse specialized in ambulatory cardiac interventions was in charge of the full SDD protocol, including eligibility, patient flow, in-hospital logistics, patient education, and discharge as well as early post-discharge follow-up by smartphone-based virtual visits. Patients planned for AF ablation were considered eligible if they had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥35%, with basic support at home and accessibility of the hospital within 60 min also forming a part of the eligibility criteria. A total of 420 consecutive patients were screened by the SDD coordinator, of whom 331 were eligible for SDD. The reasons for exclusion were living remotely (29, 6.9%), lack of support at home (19, 4.5%), or LVEF <35% (17, 4.0%). Of the eligible patients, 300 (91%) were successfully discharged the same day. There were no major post-SDD complications. Rates of unplanned medical attention (19, 6.3%) and 30-day readmission (5, 1.6%) were extremely low and driven by femoral access-site complications. These were significantly reduced upon the introduction of compulsory ultrasound-guided punctures after the initial 150 SDD patients (P = 0.0145). Standardized SDD coordination resulted in efficient workflows and reduced the total workload of the medical staff. CONCLUSION: Same-day discharge after AF ablation following a nurse-coordinated standardized protocol is safe and efficient. The concept of ambulatory cardiac intervention nurses functioning as dedicated coordinators may be key in the future transition of hospitals to SDD. Ultrasound-guided femoral puncture virtually eliminated relevant femoral access-site complications in our cohort and should therefore be a prerequisite for SDD.

Regional conduction velocities determined by non-invasive mapping are associated with arrhythmia-free survival after atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial arrhythmogenic substrate is a key determinant of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and reduced conduction-velocities have been linked to adverse outcome. However, a non-invasive method to assess such electrophysiological substrate is not available to date. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to non-invasively assess regional conduction-velocities and their association with arrhythmia-free survival following PVI. METHODS: 52 consecutive patients scheduled for AF ablation (PVI-only) and 19 healthy controls were prospectively included and received electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi) to non-invasively determine regional atrial conduction-velocities in sinus rhythm. A novel ECGi technology obviating the need of additional CT- or CMR-imaging was applied and validated using invasive mapping. RESULTS: Mean ECGi-determined atrial conduction-velocities were significantly lower in AF-patients than in healthy controls (1.45±0.15 versus 1.64±0.15m/s; p<0.0001). Differences were particularly pronounced in a regional analysis considering only the segment with the lowest average conduction-velocity in each patient (0.8±0.22 versus 1.08±0.26m/s; p<0.0001). This average conduction velocity of the "slowest" segment was independently associated with arrhythmia recurrence and better discriminated between PVI-responders and non-responders than previously proposed predictors including left atrial size or late-gadolinium-enhancement (MRI). Patients without slow-conduction areas (mean conduction-velocity <0.78m/s) showed significantly higher 12-months arrhythmia-free survival than those with one or more slow-conduction areas (88.9% versus 48.0%, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to investigate regional atrial conduction velocities non-invasively. The absence of ECGi-determined slow-conduction areas well discriminates PVI-responders from non-responders. Such non-invasive assessment of electrical arrhythmogenic substrate may guide treatment strategies and be a step towards personalised AF therapy.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischemic Heart Disease: What Is Known and New Perspectives.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: This review aims to evaluate current evidence regarding ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ischemic heart disease and explore novel approaches currently developing to improve procedural and long-term outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently published trials (PARTITA, PAUSE-SCD, and SURVIVE-VT) have demonstrated the prognostic benefit of prophylactic ventricular tachycardia ablation compared to current clinical practice. Advanced cardiac imaging provides a valuable pre-procedural evaluation of the arrhythmogenic substrate, identifying ablation targets non-invasively. Advanced cardiac mapping techniques allow to better characterize arrhythmogenic substrate during ablation procedure. Emerging technologies like pulsed field ablation and ultra-low temperature cryoablation show promise in ventricular tachycardia ablation. Advancements in mapping techniques, ablation technologies, and pre-procedural cardiac imaging offer promise for improving ventricular tachycardia ablation outcomes in ischemic heart disease.

Non-invasive detection of slow conduction with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for ventricular tachycardia ablation.

AIMS: Non-invasive myocardial scar characterization with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been shown to accurately identify conduction channels and can be an important aid for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. A new mapping method based on targeting deceleration zones (DZs) has become one of the most commonly used strategies for VT ablation procedures. The aim of the study was to analyse the capability of CMR to identify DZs and to find predictors of arrhythmogenicity in CMR channels. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-four consecutive patients with structural heart disease and VT undergoing ablation after CMR at a single centre (October 2018 to July 2021) were included (mean age, 64.8 ± 11.6 years; 95.5% male; 70.5% with ischaemic heart disease; a mean ejection fraction of 32.3 ± 7.8%). The characteristics of CMR channels were analysed, and correlations with DZs detected during isochronal late activation mapping in both baseline maps and remaps were determined. Overall, 109 automatically detected CMR channels were analysed (2.48 ± 1.15 per patient; length, 57.91 ± 63.07 mm; conducting channel mass, 2.06 ± 2.67 g; protectedness, 21.44 ± 25.39 mm). Overall, 76.1% of CMR channels were associated with a DZ. A univariate analysis showed that channels associated with DZs were longer [67.81 ± 68.45 vs. 26.31 ± 21.25 mm, odds ratio (OR) 1.03, P = 0.010], with a higher border zone (BZ) mass (2.41 ± 2.91 vs. 0.87 ± 0.86 g, OR 2.46, P = 0.011) and greater protectedness (24.97 ± 27.72 vs. 10.19 ± 9.52 mm, OR 1.08, P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Non-invasive detection of targets for VT ablation is possible with CMR. Deceleration zones found during electroanatomical mapping accurately correlate with CMR channels, especially those with increased length, BZ mass, and protectedness.

Post-Ablation cardiac Magnetic resonance to assess Ventricular Tachycardia recurrence (PAM-VT study).

AIMS: Conducting channels (CCs) detected by late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) are related to ventricular tachycardia (VT). The aim of this work was to study the ability of post-ablation LGE-CMR to evaluate ablation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a prospective study of consecutive patients referred for a scar-related VT ablation. LGE-CMR was performed 6-12 months prior to ablation and 3-6 months after ablation. Scar characteristics of pre- and post-ablation LGE-CMR were compared. During the study period (March 2019-April 2021), 61 consecutive patients underwent scar-related VT ablation after LGE-CMR. Overall, 12 patients were excluded (4 had poor-quality LGE-CMR, 2 died before post-ablation LGE-CMR, and 6 underwent post-ablation LGE-CMR 12 months after ablation). Finally, 49 patients (age: 65.5 ± 9.8 years, 97.9% male, left ventricular ejection fraction: 34.8 ± 10.4%, 87.7% ischaemic cardiomyopathy) were included. Post-ablation LGE-CMR showed a decrease in the number (3.34 ± 1.03 vs. 1.6 ± 0.2; P < 0.0001) and mass (8.45 ± 1.3 vs. 3.5 ± 0.6 g; P < 0.001) of CCs. Arrhythmogenic CCs disappeared in 74.4% of patients. Dark core was detected in 75.5% of patients, and its presence was not related to CC reduction (52.2 ± 7.4% vs. 40.8 ± 10.6%, P = 0.57). VT recurrence after one year follow-up was 16.3%. The presence of two or more channels in the post-ablation LGE-CMR was a predictor of VT recurrence (31.82% vs. 0%, P = 0.0038) with a sensibility of 100% and specificity of 61% (area under the curve 0.82). In the same line, a reduction of CCs < 55% had sensibility of 100% and specificity of 61% (area under the curve 0.83) to predict VT recurrence. CONCLUSION: Post-ablation LGE-CMR is feasible, and a reduction in the number of CCs is related with lower risk of VT recurrence. The dark core was not present in all patients. A decrease in VT substrate was also observed in patients without a dark core area in the post-ablation LGE-CMR.

Myocardial scarring and recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia in patients surviving an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

INTRODUCTION: Prediction of recurrent ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in survivors of an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is important, but currently difficult. Risk of recurrence may be related to presence of myocardial scarring assessed with late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR). Our study aims to characterize myocardial scarring as defined by LGE-CMR in survivors of a VA-OHCA and investigate its potential role in the risk of new VA events. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2022, a total of 230 VA-OHCA patients without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction had CMR before implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation for secondary prevention at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, and Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, of which n = 170 patients had a conventional (no LGE protocol) CMR and n = 60 patients had LGE-CMR (including LGE protocol). Scar tissue including core, border zone (BZ) and BZ channels were automatically detected by specialized investigational software in patients with LGE-CMR. The primary endpoint was recurrent VA. RESULTS: After exclusion, n = 52 VA-OHCA patients with LGE-CMR and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 49 ± 16% were included, of which 18 (32%) patients reached the primary endpoint of VA. Patients with recurrent VA in exhibited greater scar mass, core mass, BZ mass, and presence of BZ channels compared with patients without recurrent VA. The presence of BZ channels identified patients with recurrent VA with 67% sensitivity and 85% specificity (area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.76; 95% CI: 0.63-0.89; p < .001) and was the strongest predictor of the primary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of BZ channels was the strongest predictor of recurrent VA in patients with an out of-hospital cardiac arrest and LGE-CMR.

Magnetic resonance detection of advanced atrial cardiomyopathy increases the risk for atypical atrial flutter occurrence following atrial fibrillation ablation.

AIMS: Recurrence of arrhythmia after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the form of atypical atrial flutter (AFL) is common among a significant number of patients and often requires redo ablation with limited success rates. Identifying patients at high risk of AFL after AF ablation could aid in patient selection and personalized ablation approach. The study aims to assess the relationship between pre-existing atrial cardiomyopathy and the occurrence of AFL following AF ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed a cohort of 1007 consecutive AF patients who underwent catheter ablation and were included in a prospective registry. Patients who did not have baseline cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE-CMR) or did not experience any recurrences were excluded. A total of 166 patients were included gathering 56 patients who underwent re-ablation due to AFL recurrences and 110 patients who underwent re-ablation due to AF recurrences (P = 0.11). A multiparametric assessment of atrial cardiomyopathy was based on basal LGE-CMR, including left atrial (LA) volume, LA sphericity, and global and segmental LA fibrosis using semiautomated post-processing software. Out of the initial cohort of 1007 patients, AFL and AF occurred in 56 and 110 patients, respectively. An age higher than 65 [odds ratio (OR) = 5.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2-14.4], the number of previous ablations (OR = 3.0, 95% CI: 1.2-7.8), and the management of ablation lines in the index procedure (OR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.0-6.3) were independently associated with AFL occurrence. Furthermore, several characteristics assessed by LGE-CMR were identified as independent predictors of AFL recurrence after the index ablation for AF, such as enhanced LA sphericity (OR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.6), LA global fibrosis (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07), and increased fibrosis in the lateral wall (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04). CONCLUSION: Advanced atrial cardiomyopathy assessed by LGE-CMR, such as increased LA sphericity, global LA fibrosis, and fibrosis in the lateral wall, is independently associated with arrhythmia recurrence in the form of AFL following AF ablation.

Riesgo arrítmico en episodios únicos o recurrentes de síncope inexplicado con bloqueo completo de rama / Arrhythmic risk in single or recurrent episodes of unexplained syncope with complete bundle branch block

Introducción y objetivos: Los pacientes con un episodio sincopal inexplicable único (ESU) y bloqueo completo de rama del haz de His (BcR) con frecuencia se tratan de manera más conservadora que aquellos con episodios recurrentes (ESR). El objetivo fue analizar si existen diferencias entre pacientes con ESU o ESR y BcR en cuanto al riesgo arrítmico, el rendimiento diagnóstico de las pruebas y los resultados clínicos. Métodos: Estudio de cohorte de pacientes consecutivos con seguimiento medio de 3 años. Fueron estudiados mediante un protocolo escalonado basado en un estudio electrofisiológico y seguimiento con un monitor cardiaco implantable (MCI). Resultados: De los 503 pacientes incluidos en el estudio, 238 (47,3%) referían un ESU. El riesgo de síncope arrítmico fue similar en ambos grupos (58,8% ESU frente a 57,0% ESR; p=0,68), también tras ajustar por variables de confusión (HR=1,06; IC95%, 0,81-1,38; p=0,674). No se encontraron diferencias significativas en cuanto a los resultados del estudio electrofisiológico y la rentabilidad diagnóstica del monitor cardiaco implantable. Un total de 141 (59,2%) pacientes con ESU y 154 (58,1%) con ESR requirieron el implante de un dispositivo cardiaco (p=0,797). Tras el tratamiento adecuado, 35 (7%) pacientes presentaron recurrencia del síncope. La tasa de recurrencia y la mortalidad también fueron similares. Conclusiones: Los pacientes con BcR y síncope tienen un alto riesgo de tener una etiología arrítmica, aunque solo hayan presentado un episodio aislado. Los pacientes con ESU y ESR tienen un riesgo arrítmico similar y presentan un pronóstico similar, por lo que no existe una justificación clínica para no tratarlos de la misma manera.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: Patients with a single syncopal episode (SSE) and complete bundle branch block (cBBB) are frequently managed more conservatively than patients with recurrent episodes (RSE). The objective of this study was to analyze if there are differences between patients with single or recurrent unexplained syncope and cBBB in arrhythmic risk, the diagnostic yield of tests, and clinical outcomes. Methods: Cohort study of consecutive patients with unexplained syncope and cBBB with a median follow-up time of 3 years. The patients were evaluated via a stepwise workup protocol based on electrophysiological study (EPS) and long-term follow-up with an implantable cardiac monitor. Results: Of the 503 patients included in the study, 238 (47.3%) had had only 1 syncopal episode. The risk of an arrhythmic syncope was similar in both groups (58.8% in SSE vs 57.0% in RSE; P=.68), also after adjustment for possible confounding variables (HR, 1.06; 95%CI, 0.81-1.38; P=.674). No significant differences between the groups were found in the EPS results and implantable cardiac monitor diagnostic yield. A total of 141 (59.2%) patients with SSE and 154 (58.1%) patients with RSE required cardiac device implantation (P=.797). After appropriate treatment, 35 (7%) patients had recurrence of syncope. The recurrence rate and mortality were also similar in both groups. Conclusions: Patients with cBBB and unexplained syncope are at high risk of an arrhythmic etiology, even after the first syncopal episode. Patients with SSE and RSE have a similar arrhythmic risk and similar outcomes, and therefore there is no clinical justification for not managing them in the same manner.(AU)

Evolution of Deceleration Zones During Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation and Relation With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.

BACKGROUND: A new functional mapping strategy based on targeting deceleration zones (DZs) has become one of the most commonly used strategies within the armamentarium of substrate-based ablation methods for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart disease. The classic conduction channels detected by voltage mapping can be accurately determined by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to analyze the evolution of DZs during ablation and their correlation with CMR. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients with scar-related VT undergoing ablation after CMR in Hospital Clinic (October 2018-December 2020) were included (median age 65.3 ± 11.8 years; 94.7% male; 73.7% ischemic heart disease). Baseline DZs and their evolution in isochronal late activation remaps were analyzed. A comparison between DZs and CMR conducting channels (CMR-CCs) was realized. Patients were prospectively followed for VT recurrence for 1 year. RESULTS: Overall, 95 DZs were analyzed, 93.68% of which were correlated with CMR-CCs: 44.8% located in the middle segment and 55.2% located in the entrance/exit of the channel. Remapping was performed in 91.7% of patients (1 remap: 33.3%, 2 remaps: 55.6%, and 3 remaps: 2.8%). Regarding the evolution of DZs, 72.2% disappeared after the first ablation set, with 14.13% not ablated at the end of the procedure. A total of 32.5% of DZs in remaps correlated with a CMR-CCs already detected, and 17.5% were associated with an unmasked CMR-CCs. One-year VT recurrence was 22.9%. CONCLUSIONS: DZs are highly correlated with CMR-CCs. In addition, remapping can lead to the identification of hidden substrate initially not identified by electroanatomic mapping but detected by CMR.

Stepwise application of ECG and electrogram-based criteria to ensure electrical resynchronization with left bundle branch pacing.

AIMS: To define a stepwise application of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) criteria that will simplify implantation and guarantee electrical resynchronization. Left bundle branch pacing has emerged as an alternative to biventricular pacing. However, a systematic stepwise criterion to ensure electrical resynchronization is lacking. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of 24 patients from the LEVEL-AT trial (NCT04054895) who received LBBP and had electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) at 45 days post-implant were included. The usefulness of ECG- and electrogram-based criteria to predict accurate electrical resynchronization with LBBP were analyzed. A two-step approach was developed. The gold standard used to confirm resynchronization was the change in ventricular activation pattern and shortening in left ventricular activation time, assessed by ECGI. Twenty-two (91.6%) patients showed electrical resynchronization on ECGI. All patients fulfilled pre-screwing requisites: lead in septal position in left-oblique projection and W paced morphology in V1. In the first step, presence of either right bundle branch conduction delay pattern (qR or rSR in V1) or left bundle branch capture Plus (QRS ≤120 ms) resulted in 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity to predict LBBP resynchronization, with an accuracy of 95.8%. In the second step, the presence of selective capture (100% specificity, only 41% sensitivity) or a spike-R <80 ms in non-selective capture (100% specificity, sensitivity 46%) ensured 100% accuracy to predict resynchronization with LBBP. CONCLUSION: Stepwise application of ECG and electrogram criteria may provide an accurate assessment of electrical resynchronization with LBBP (Graphical abstract).

Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Heart Failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite substantial progress in medical and device-based heart failure (HF) therapy, ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) remain a major challenge. Here we review contemporary management of VA in the context of HF with one particular focus on recent advances in imaging and catheter ablation. RECENT FINDINGS: Besides limited efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), their potentially life-threatening side effects are increasingly acknowledged. On the other hand, with tremendous advances in catheter technology, electroanatomical mapping, imaging, and understanding of arrhythmia mechanisms, catheter ablation has evolved into a safe, efficacious therapy. In fact, recent randomized trials support early catheter ablation, demonstrating superiority over AAD. Importantly, CMR imaging with gadolinium contrast has emerged as a central tool for the management of VA complicating HF: CMR is not only essential for an accurate diagnosis of the underlying entity and subsequent treatment decisions, but also improves risk stratification for SCD prevention and patient selection for ICD therapy. Finally, 3-dimensional characterization of arrhythmogenic substrate by CMR and imaging-guided ablation approaches substantially enhance procedural safety and efficacy. VA management in HF patients is highly complex and should be addressed in a multidisciplinary approach, preferably at specialized centers. While recent evidence supports early catheter ablation of VA, an impact on mortality remains to be demonstrated. Moreover, risk stratification for ICD therapy may have to be reconsidered, taking into account imaging, genetic testing, and other parameters beyond left ventricular function.

Multicenter prospective comparison of conventional and high-power short duration radiofrequency application for pulmonary vein isolation: the high-power short-duration radiofrequency application for faster and safer pulmonary vein ablation (POWER FAST III) trial.

BACKGROUND: Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PV) with high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency application (RFa) may reduce the duration of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, without compromising the procedural efficacy and safety in comparison with the conventional approach. This hypothesis has been generated in several observational studies; the POWER FAST III will test it in a randomized multicenter clinical trial. METHODS: It is a multicenter randomized, open-label and non-inferiority clinical trial with two parallel groups. AF ablation using 70 W and 9-10 s RFa is compared with the conventional technique using 25-40 W RFa guided by numerical lesion indexes. The main efficacy objective is the incidence of atrial arrhythmia recurrences electrocardiographically documented during 1-year follow-up. The main safety objective is the incidence of endoscopically detected esophageal thermal lesions (EDEL). This trial includes a substudy of incidence of asymptomatic cerebral lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after ablation. RESULTS: A randomized clinical trial compares for the first time high-power short-duration and conventional ablation in order to obtain data about the efficacy and safety of the high-power technique in an adequate methodological context. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the POWER FAST III could support the use of the high-power short-duration ablation in clinical practice. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NTC04153747.

Scar conducting channel characterization to predict arrhythmogenicity during ventricular tachycardia ablation.

AIMS: Heterogeneous tissue channels (HTCs) detected by late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) are related to ventricular arrhythmias, but there are few published data about their arrhythmogenic characteristics. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 34 consecutive patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy who were referred for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. LGE-CMR was performed prior to ablation, and the HTCs were analyzed. Arrhythmogenic HTCs linked to induced VT were identified during the VT ablation procedure. The characteristics of arrhythmogenic HTCs were compared with those of non-arrhythmogenic HTCs. Three patients were excluded due to low-quality LGE-CMR images. A total of 87 HTCs were identified on LGE-CMR in 31 patients (age:63.8 ± 12.3 years; 96.8% male; left ventricular ejection fraction: 36.1 ± 10.7%). Of the 87 HTCs, only 31 were considered arrhythmogenic because of their relation to a VT isthmus. The HTCs related to a VT isthmus were longer [64.6 ± 49.4 vs. 32.9 ± 26.6 mm; OR: 1.02; 95% CI: (1.01-1.04); P < 0.001] and had greater mass [2.5 ± 2.2 vs. 1.2 ± 1.2 grams; OR: 1.62; 95% CI: (1.18-2.21); P < 0.001], a higher degree of protectedness [26.19 ± 19.2 vs. 10.74 ± 8.4; OR 1.09; 95% CI: (1.04-1.14); P < 0.001], higher transmurality [number of wall layers with CCs: 3.8 ± 2.4 vs. 2.4 ± 2.0; OR: 1.31; 95% CI: (1.07-1.60); P = 0.008] and more ramifications [3.8 ± 2.0 vs. 2.7 ± 1.1; OR: 1.59; 95% CI: (1.15-2.19); P = 0.002] than non-arrhythmogenic HTCs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that protectedness was the strongest predictor of arrhythmogenicity. CONCLUSION: The protectedness of an HTC identified by LGE-CMR is strongly related to its arrhythmogenicity during VT ablation.

Predictive value of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: dual-centre validation of a standardized method.

Aims: With recurrence rates up to 50% after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), predictive tools to improve patient selection are needed. Patient selection based on left atrial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been proposed previously (UTAH-classification). However, this approach has not been widely established, in part owed to the lack of standardization of the LGE quantification method. We have recently established a standardized LGE-CMR method enabling reproducible LGE-quantification. Here, the ability of this method to predict outcome after PVI was evaluated. Methods and results: This dual-centre study (n = 219) consists of a prospective derivation cohort (n = 37, all persistent AF) and an external validation cohort (n = 182; 66 persistent, 116 paroxysmal AF). All patients received an LGE-CMR prior to first-time PVI-only ablation. LGE was quantified based on the signal-intensity-ratio relative to the blood pool, applying a uniform LGE-defining threshold of >1.2.  In patients with persistent AF in the derivation cohort, left atrial LGE-extent above a cut-off value of 12% was found to best predict relevant low-voltage substrate (≥2 cm two with <0.5 mV during sinus rhythm) and arrhythmia-free survival 12 months post-PVI. When applied to the external validation cohort, this cut-off value was also predictive of arrhythmia-free survival for both, the total cohort and the subgroup with persistent AF (LGE < 12%: 80% and 76%; LGE > 12%: 55% and 44%; P = 0.007 and P = 0.029, respectively). Conclusion: This dual-centre study established and validated a standardized, reproducible LGE-CMR method discriminating PVI responders from non-responders, which may improve choice of therapeutic approach or ablation strategy for patients with persistent AF.

Non-invasive assessment of pulmonary vein isolation durability using late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging.

AIMS: Electrical reconnection of pulmonary veins (PVs) is considered an important determinant of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). To date, AF recurrences almost automatically trigger invasive repeat procedures, required to assess PVI durability. With recent technical advances, it is becoming increasingly common to find all PVs isolated in those repeat procedures. Thus, as ablation of extra-PV targets has failed to show benefit in randomized trials, more and more often these highly invasive procedures are performed only to rule out PV reconnection. Here we aim to define the ability of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to rule out PV reconnection non-invasively. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study is based on a prospective registry in which all patients receive an LGE-MRI after AF ablation. Included were all patients that-after an initial PVI and post-ablation LGE-MRI-underwent an invasive repeat procedure, which served as a reference to determine the predictive value of non-invasive lesion assessment by LGE-MRI.: 152 patients and 304 PV pairs were analysed. LGE-MRI predicted electrical PV reconnection with high sensitivity (98.9%) but rather low specificity (55.6%). Of note, LGE lesions without discontinuation ruled out reconnection of the respective PV pair with a negative predictive value of 96.9%, and patients with complete LGE lesion sets encircling all PVs were highly unlikely to show any PV reconnection (negative predictive value: 94.4%). CONCLUSION: LGE-MRI has the potential to guide selection of appropriate candidates and planning of the ablation strategy for repeat procedures and may help to identify patients that will not benefit from a redo-procedure if no ablation of extra-PV targets is intended.

Accuracy of standard bipolar amplitude voltage thresholds to identify late potential channels in ventricular tachycardia ablation.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is caused by the presence of a slow conduction channel (CC) of border zone (BZ) tissue inside the scar-core tissue. Electroanatomic mapping can depict this tissue by voltage mapping. Areas of slow conduction can be detected as late potentials (LPs) and their abolition is the most accepted ablation endpoint. In the current guidelines, bipolar voltage thresholds for BZ and core scar are 1.5 and 0.5 mV respectively. The performance of these values is controversial. The aim of the study is to analyze the diagnostic yield of current amplitude thresholds in voltage map to define VT substrate in terms of CCs of LPs. Predictors of usefulness of current thresholds will be analyzed. METHODS: All patients with structural heart disease who underwent VT ablation in Hospital Clinic in 2016-2017 were included. Maps with delineation of CCs based on LPs were created with contact force sensor catheter. Thresholds were adjusted for every patient based on CCs. Diagnostic yield and predictors of performance of conventional thresholds were analyzed. RESULTS: During study period, 57 consecutive patients were included (age: 60.4 ± 8.5; 50.2% ischemic cardiomyopathy, LVEF 39.8 ± 13.5%). Cutoff voltages that better identified the scar and BZ according to the LP channels were 0.32 (0.02-2 mV) and 1.84 (0.3-6 mV) respectively. Current voltage thresholds identified correctly core and BZ in 87.7% and 42.1% of the patients respectively. Accuracy was worse in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) especially for BZ (28.6% vs 55.2%, p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Accuracy of standard voltage thresholds for scar and BZ is poor in terms of LPs detection. Diagnostic yield is worse in NICM patients specially for border zone.

Quantification of right atrial fibrosis by cardiac magnetic resonance: verification of the method to standardize thresholds.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) allows noninvasive detection of left atrial fibrosis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, whether the same methodology can be used in the right atrium (RA) remains unknown. Our aim was to define a standardized threshold to characterize RA fibrosis in LGE-CMR. METHODS: A 3 Tesla LGE-CMR was performed in 53 individuals; the RA was segmented, and the image intensity ratio (IIR) calculated for the RA wall using 1 557 767 IIR pixels (40 994±10 693 per patient). The upper limit of normality of the IIR (mean IIR+2 standard deviations) was estimated in healthy volunteers (n=9), and patients who had undergone previous typical atrial flutter ablation (n=9) were used to establish the dense scar threshold. Paroxysmal and persistent AF patients (n=10 each) were used for validation. IIR values were correlated with a high-density bipolar voltage map in 15 patients undergoing AF ablation. RESULTS: The upper normality limit (total fibrosis threshold) in healthy volunteers was set at an IIR = 1.21. In the postablation group, 60% of the maximum IIR pixel (dense fibrosis threshold) was calculated as IIR = 1.29. Endocardial bipolar voltage showed a weak but significant correlation with IIR. The overall accuracy between the electroanatomical map and LGE-CMR to characterize fibrosis was 56%. CONCLUSIONS: An IIR > 1.21 was determined to be the threshold for the detection of right atrial fibrosis, while an IIR > 1.29 differentiates interstitial fibrosis from dense scar. Despite differences between the left and right atria, fibrosis could be assessed with LGE-CMR using similar thresholds in both chambers.

Arrhythmic risk in single or recurrent episodes of unexplained syncope with complete bundle branch block.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with a single syncopal episode (SSE) and complete bundle branch block (cBBB) are frequently managed more conservatively than patients with recurrent episodes (RSE). The objective of this study was to analyze if there are differences between patients with single or recurrent unexplained syncope and cBBB in arrhythmic risk, the diagnostic yield of tests, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Cohort study of consecutive patients with unexplained syncope and cBBB with a median follow-up time of 3 years. The patients were evaluated via a stepwise workup protocol based on electrophysiological study (EPS) and long-term follow-up with an implantable cardiac monitor. RESULTS: Of the 503 patients included in the study, 238 (47.3%) had had only 1 syncopal episode. The risk of an arrhythmic syncope was similar in both groups (58.8% in SSE vs 57.0% in RSE; P=.68), also after adjustment for possible confounding variables (HR, 1.06; 95%CI, 0.81-1.38; P=.674). No significant differences between the groups were found in the EPS results and implantable cardiac monitor diagnostic yield. A total of 141 (59.2%) patients with SSE and 154 (58.1%) patients with RSE required cardiac device implantation (P=.797). After appropriate treatment, 35 (7%) patients had recurrence of syncope. The recurrence rate and mortality were also similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cBBB and unexplained syncope are at high risk of an arrhythmic etiology, even after the first syncopal episode. Patients with SSE and RSE have a similar arrhythmic risk and similar outcomes, and therefore there is no clinical justification for not managing them in the same manner.